Self-Inflicted Violence

Self-Inflicted Violence

Sheldon Richman

by Sheldon Richman
February/March 2002

In the aftermath of the horrors of September 11 and in our wish for justice for the perpetrators, we seem to have forgotten another kind of violence that is ready to befall America: the self-inflicted violence of an open-ended and essentially secret global war conducted by the U.S. government against an amorphous enemy, “Terrorism.”

It would be the ultimate tragedy if our rational desire for justice were transmogrified into a blank check. The violence that such a thing would inflict on American society would not be of the metaphorical variety. It would be real, and the costs would be incalculable.

Secrecy and open-endedness undermine what the founding generation called “free government.” If, as the theory goes, government in a constitutional republic (erroneously called “democracy”) is the servant – not the master – of the people, the people ought to know what it’s up to. The Founders wanted stringent controls on the government’s ability to make war and conduct foreign policy in part because they understood that such policies would perforce be conducted in plausible secrecy. (Under the Constitution the president is the commander in chief, but only Congress can declare war and control the purse.)

Secrecy in domestic policy is ludicrous. If a critic of Social Security charged that it will be insolvent in 15 years, no president could get away with replying, “I possess information showing that to be a false and irresponsible allegation. But that information is classified and it would jeopardize national security were I to divulge it..”

But those words are spoken all the time in foreign affairs. And hardly anyone objects.

The Founders therefore, recognized the eternal validity of this argument: Foreign policy requires secrecy. Secrecy undermines limited government. Therefore, the foreign policymaking of a limited government should be strictly limited. No wonder Washington and Jefferson counseled against alliances.

As President Bush says, a war against nebulous terrorism, spread around more than 60 countries, will be fought in many ways. Besides the cruise missiles and bombs let loose from safe distances, there will be secret special operations we may never hear about. Whom will they be launched against? Terrorists, of course. On the basis of what evidence? That’s classified. Trust us. (Remember the pharmaceutical factory Bill Clinton bombed.)

The financial infrastructure of the terrorist organizations will be disrupted, in part by gaining access to banking information. On the basis of what evidence? That’s classified. Trust us.

The homes of people living in the United States will be searched without their knowledge. On the basis of what evidence? That’s classified. Trust us.

People’s telephones will be tapped and their e-mail read. On the basis of what evidence? That’s classified. Trust us.

Noncitizens will be detained without charge. On the basis of what evidence? That’s classified. Trust us.

Trust us. It has a warm, cozy sound to it – until you remind yourself who is saying it. At a time when many are wondering what makes someone a “good American,” let us keep in mind that there is something distinctly un-American about trusting the government. When the Federalists outlawed criticism of the government with the Sedition Act in 1798, Vice President Thomas Jefferson wrote the Kentucky Resolutions, in which he said, “Confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism – free government is founded in jealousy [that is, distrust]; it is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power.”

It should be obvious that this war on terrorism, as defined by the Bush administration, would dissolve the chains required “to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power.”

But, it will be said, we were viciously assaulted on September 11 and that may not be the last of it. Something must be done.

That’s true. But there is no more dangerous time than when one feels one must do something – anything – because “something must be done.”

We rights absolutists are sometimes criticized for embracing the motto “Let justice be done though the heavens fall.” Now it is those who would erode our rights who embrace that motto.

Sheldon Richman is a senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation in Fairfax, Va., author of Tethered Citizens: Why We Must Abolish the Welfare State, and editor of Ideas on Liberty magazine.


Also by Sheldon Richman

  • The Multiracial Activist – Count Me Out
  • The Multiracial Activist – Elian’s Fate: It’s Not America’s Decision
  • The Multiracial Activist – Reno’s Disgrace
  • The Multiracial Activist – Of, By, And For The People?
  • The Multiracial Activist – Preventing Holocausts
  • The Multiracial Activist – Terrorism and the Drug War
  • The Multiracial Activist – An Unkeepable Promise
  • The Multiracial Activist – An Astounding Remark
  • The Abolitionist Examiner – The Key To Race: Depoliticize It
  • Book: Your Money or Your Life
  • Book: Separating School and State


    Copyright © 2002 The Future of Freedom Foundation. All rights reserved.

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.