Zur Navigation | Zum Inhalt
     
 
Letter to Senate Regarding S. 1693
User Rating: / 0
Advocacy and Letters - Letters to Government Agencies Signed by TMA
Written by Coalition   
Monday, 19 May 2008

May 19, 2008

Re:       Oppose the Wired for Health Care Quality Act, S. 1693

Dear Senator:

Attempting progress without sufficient privacy protections will undercut the overarching goals of building a trusted national health information technology (Health IT) system.  The Coalition for Patient Privacy urges you to vote against the Wired for Health Care Quality Act, S. 1693.  While the proposed privacy amendment to the “Wired Act” has some positive provisions, it does not go far enough to give Americans any assurances that their personal health records stay private.   

The outcome of any Health IT legislation will truly impact Americans to the very core of their beings.  Nothing is more personal than our health.  Personal health information effects our reputations, our opportunities and those of our children and generations to come.  As the consequences of mandating Health IT without privacy are so dire, we can only support the Wired Act if it incorporates the eleven Privacy Principles developed by our bi-partisan coalition of consumer advocacy organizations.     

The 2007 Privacy Principles of the Coalition for Patient Privacy are:

  • Recognize that patients have the right to health privacy
    • Recognize that user interfaces must be accessible so that health consumers with disabilities can individually manage their health records to ensure their medical privacy.
  • The right to health privacy applies to all health information regardless of the source, the form it is in, or who handles it
  • Give patients the right to opt-in and opt-out of electronic systems; i.e. the right for patients to give or withhold their consent for the use and disclosure of their health information.
    • Give patients the right to segment sensitive information
    • Give patients control over who can access their electronic health records
  • Health information disclosed for one purpose may not be used for another purpose before informed consent has been obtained
  • Require audit trails of every disclosure of patient information
  • Require that patients be notified promptly of suspected or actual privacy breaches
  • Ensure that consumers cannot be compelled to share health information to obtain employment, insurance, credit, or admission to schools, unless required by statute
  • Deny employers access to employees’ health records before informed consent has been obtained
  • Preserve stronger privacy protections in state laws
  • No secret health databases. Consumers need a clean slate. Require all existing holders of health information to disclose if they hold a patient’s health information
  • Provide meaningful penalties and enforcement mechanisms for privacy violations detected by patients, advocates, and government regulators 

We believe these principles are essential to protect Americans’ private health records and are essential for quality health care. If we fail to protect the individual’s right to privacy of the most intimate and confidential personal data, the individual will be selective in providing information. When patients avoid telling their physician everything they should, it compromises treatment and can cause “bad” outcomes, including the creation of electronic health records that are inaccurate, incomplete, and possibly dangerously misleading. 

Moreover, without these basic privacy principles as the foundation of Health IT systems, Americans are open to widespread discrimination.  Self-insured employers can deny promotions or jobs.  Insurers, including those offering health, life and property, car, mortgage and other kinds of insurance, can set higher rates or deny coverage altogether.  Schools can refuse admission to students with chronic illnesses or histories of depression. Banks can decline loans or charge more for credit.   

Legislation that will cause so much harm and deny opportunities to so many worthy Americans, whether intended or not, surely deserves extensive public hearings.  We encourage you to hold hearings on health privacy issues in the appropriate Senate committees at the earliest possible time.   

Please stand up for your constituents’ privacy and that of your own; do not allow the Wired Act to be “hotlined” in the Senate.  We appreciate your leadership and hope you will restore Americans’ longstanding rights to control personal health information.  We look forward to working with you and your staff. 

Sincerely, 

The Coalition for Patient Privacy

American Civil Liberties Union

Citizens for Health

Clinical Social Work Association

Consumer Action

Just Health

The Multiracial Activist

Pain Relief Network

Patient Privacy Rights

U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation

For additional information please contact: Deborah Peel, MDFounder & ChairPatient Privacy Rights(O) 512-732-0033

(C) 512-970-9007

This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it

www.patientprivacyrights.org

Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (332) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 4423

 
Press Release: The Multiracial Activist Joins Amicus Brief to Supreme Court Case
User Rating: / 0
The News - Press Releases Sent By TMA and Coalition Partners
Written by James A. Landrith   
Friday, 16 May 2008

Press Release: The Multiracial Activist Joins Amicus Brief to Supreme Court Case

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 16, 2008

The Multiracial Activist
Contact: James Landrith
Phone: 703-593-2065
Fax: 760-875-8547
Email: \n This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
URL:
http://www.multiracial.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Alexandria, VA -- Today, a group of 27 legal scholars and technical experts and 13 privacy and civil liberty groups filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in the case of Herring v. U.S.  The Multiracial Activist (TMA) was among the signers of this important brief.

From the Electronic Privacy Information Center on this case:

In Herring v. US, the police searched and then arrested Bennie Dean Herring based on incorrect information in a government database. He was illegally arrested and searched even though he told the officers that there was no arrest warrant, and no officer had seen or could produce a copy of the arrest warrant.

After he was indicted, Herring petitioned the district court to suppress the evidence gathered incident to his unlawful arrest, arguing the exclusionary rule prevented the use of such evidence. But the district court rule against him. Herring then appealed to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed the district court's ruling. Herring then petitioned for cert. to the US Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court agreed on February 19, 2008 to consider the case and decide whether to suppress the evidence obtained.

“The heart of this case speaks to the dangers of bureaucratic information sharing, domestic surveillance and centralization of public and private data in government hands,” stated James Landrith, The Multiracial Activist’s founder.  “The crushing power of junk data and gross errors introduced into these massive databases pales in comparison to the damage said errors can visit upon the human being impacted by such mistakes and grossly inaccurate information.  Such destruction of careers, families and lives cannot be ignored, politically spun, or brushed aside in favor of authoritarian expediency.”

Landrith further commented that, “As these are issues that TMA has been quite vocal about in the past, the decision to join this case via today’s amicus brief was an easy one.”

Relevant Links:

EPIC’s Herring v. U.S. page:  http://epic.org/privacy/herring/

The Multiracial Activist:  http://www.multriacial.com

Amicus Brief filed today: http://epic.org/privacy/herring/07-513tsac_epic.pdf

About TMA:  The Multiracial Activist is a libertarian oriented activist journal (ISSN: 1552-3446) focusing on civil liberties issues related to multiracial self-identity and interracial relationships.  Occasionally, TMA participates in general civil liberties efforts and coalitions.

Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (298) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 4053

 
Herring v. U.S. Amicus Brief Filed
User Rating: / 0
A Mixed Blog - From The Editor
Written by James A. Landrith   
Friday, 16 May 2008

Today, a group of 27 legal scholars and technical experts and 13 privacy and civil liberty groups filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court in the case of Herring v. U.S.  The Multiracial Activist (TMA) was among the signers of this brief.

From the Electronic Privacy Information Center on this case:

In Herring v. US, the police searched and then arrested Bennie Dean Herring based on incorrect information in a government database. He was illegally arrested and searched even though he told the officers that there was no arrest warrant, and no officer had seen or could produce a copy of the arrest warrant.

After he was indicted, Herring petitioned the district court to suppress the evidence gathered incident to his unlawful arrest, arguing the exclusionary rule prevented the use of such evidence. But the district court rule against him. Herring then appealed to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which affirmed (pdf) the district court's ruling. Herring then petitioned for cert. to the US Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court agreed on February 19, 2008 to consider the case and decide whether to suppress the evidence obtained.

The heart of this case speaks to the dangers of information sharing, domestic surveillance and centralization of public and private data in federal hands, something TMA has been quite vocal about in the past:

There has been an increase in information sharing not just among government agencies, but between federal, state, local, tribal and commercial entities. In October 2005, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13388 (pdf), which created the Information Sharing Environment among these many entities. An outgrowth of this has been "fusion centers," which have received $380 million in federal grants and millions more from state governments. There are 43 current and planned fusion centers in the U.S., and some states have more than one, according to (pdf) the Congressional Research Service. The expansion of fusion center goals and increasing interaction with federal and private sector entities leads to a massive accumulation of data, raising questions of possible misuse or abuse. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) seeks to create a "national network" of local and state fusion centers, tied into DHS's "day-to-day activities." This national network combined with the Department of Homeland Security's plan to condition grant funding based on fusion center "compliance" with the federal agency’s priorities inculcates DHS with enormous domestic surveillance powers and evokes comparisons to the publicly condemned domestic surveillance program COINTELPRO.

You can explore the links below for more information on this important legal effort. 

Relevant Links:

EPIC Herring v. U.S. page:  http://epic.org/privacy/herring/

The Multiracial Activist:  http://www.multriacial.com

Amicus Brief filed today: http://epic.org/privacy/herring/07-513tsac_epic.pdf

Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (295) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 4216

 
25 NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS URGE PRIVACY IN E-PRESCRIBING
User Rating: / 1
The News - Press Releases Sent By TMA and Coalition Partners
Written by Coalition   
Tuesday, 13 May 2008

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT:

Ashley Katz

Patient Privacy Rights

(512) 732-033 or (512) 897-6390

This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

www.patientprivacyrights.org

25 NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS URGE PRIVACY IN E-PRESCRIBING

What Could Be Scary About E-Prescribing? Plenty.

Washington, DC – Twenty five organizations, including the ACLU, the Republican Liberty Caucus, the American Council for the Blind and the National Association of Social Workers joined forces via the Coalition for Patient Privacy to urge Congress to include privacy protections in any federal electronic prescribing legislation. Read the Coalition’s letter to Congress here.

What is scary about e-prescribing? Much more than you might think. Today, plenty of private corporations and employers have access to Americans’ private prescription use that includes individually identifiable data. Deborah Peel, MD, Founder of Patient Privacy Rights and leader of the Coalition explains the need for privacy with e-prescribing, “Our current system allows every prescription in the United States to be data mined and sold. This has been the reality for over a decade. You cannot keep a prescription private in the U.S. or stop your data from being sold, even if you pay cash.” This practice is completely compliant with the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

While e-prescribing is attractive to many, Americans do not want their private prescription information data mined and used without their permission. Many Americans would be quite alarmed to discover their employer and others know they take an anti-anxiety medication or that they are being treated for an STD. West Virginia is a perfect example: when state employees recently learned that Express Scripts was selling their prescription records to data miners, they were outraged. Express Scripts promptly agreed to stop this practice when faced with losing 200,000 customers.

Some argue the e-prescribing bills do not change anything. While the fact that the U.S. has a systemic, extensive system for prescription data mining and sale is NOT a secret anymore, the Coalition argues that now is the ideal time to end this unethical use of our private prescription records. When you know something bad is happening, that is the time to stop it. “Would you sit there and watch a house burn down, or let somebody bleed to death before your eyes and do nothing? Or would try to stop those harms?” asks Peel. “Now that we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the systemic theft and misuse of personal data is occurring, why wouldn’t we do all we can to stop it now, starting with e-prescribing?” Members of the Coalition for Patient Privacy actually see this debate as a golden opportunity to ensure both progress and privacy.

The Coalition for Patient Privacy recommends the following basic principles in any eprescribing legislation:

  • include a right to health information privacy (the right to control access to personal health information);
  • require that any prescription data transmitted via e-prescribing be used only for the express purpose of prescription filling and submitting the necessary codes to the insurer for payment;
  • include a provision requiring prompt notification of privacy breaches;
  • include a provision that creates meaningful penalties and enforcement mechanisms for violations detected by patients, advocates and government regulators;
  • include provisions enhancing the security of e-prescription data such as encryption when data is transmitted, stored or retained in any storage and retrieval systems, including access devices, readable cards or other methods;
  • ensure physicians who decline to use e-prescribing are not penalized;
  • ensure transparency by requiring annual reporting to patients listing everyone who has accessed their prescription data;
  • include a provision ensuring stronger state privacy laws are not pre-empted;
  • require reporting of privacy complaints to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS);
  • require CMS to provide an annual report to Congress on privacy complaints made; and
  • ensure prescription technology allows those with disabilities to be able to use eprescribing tools efficiently and effectively.

The Coalition for Patient Privacy

American Association of People with Disabilities www.aapd.org

American Association of Practicing Psychiatrists

American Association of Small Property Owners www.aaspo.org

American Civil Liberties Union www.aclu.org

American Council for the Blind www.acb.org

American Psychoanalytic Association www.apsa.org

Citizens for Health www.citizens.org

Confederation of Independent Psychoanalytic Societies www.cipsusa.org

Consumer Action www.consumer-action.org

Consumers for Health Care Choices www.chcchoices.org

The Cyber Privacy Project

Electronic Privacy Information Center www.epic.org

Equal Justice Alliance www.EqualJusticeAlliance.org

Fairfax County Privacy Council www.fairfaxcountyprivacycouncil.org

Gun Owners of America www.gunowners.org

Just Health www.justhealthnow.org

Liberty Coalition www.libertycoalition.net

The Multiracial Activist www.multiracial.com

National Association of Social Workers www.socialworkers.org

National Center for Transgender Equality www.nctequality.org

Pain Relief Network www.painreliefnetwork.org

Patient Privacy Rights www.patientprivacyrights.org

Private Citizen, Inc. www.privatecitizen.org

Republican Liberty Caucus www.rlc.org

Tolven, Inc. www.tolven.org

 

The Coalition for Patient Privacy first formed in 2006 and represents millions of Americans. Dr. Peel leads the Coalition and is the founder of Patient Privacy Rights, a national consumer health privacy watchdog organization based in Austin, TX.

Background Material

The elimination of consent for health records

The millions of individuals and entities who legally have rights to your personal information

###

Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (309) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 4096

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 May 2008 )
 
E-Prescribing Letter to House and Senate
User Rating: / 0
Advocacy and Letters - Letters to Government Agencies Signed by TMA
Written by Coalition   
Sunday, 11 May 2008

May 11, 2008

Honorable Max Baucus (D-MT)
U.S. Senate
Chairman, Senate Finance
511 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C., 20510-2602

Honorable Charles Grassley (R-IA)
U.S. Senate
Ranking Member, Senate Finance
135 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-1502

Honorable Charles B. Rangel (D-NY)
U.S. House of Representatives
Chairman, Ways and Means
2354 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C., 20515-3215

Honorable Jim McCrery (R-LA)
U.S. House of Representatives
Ranking Member, Ways & Means
242 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C., 20515-1804

Honorable John Dingell (D-MI)
U.S. House of Representatives
Chairman, Energy & Commerce
2328 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C., 20515-2215

Honorable Joe Barton (R-TX)
U.S. House of Representatives
Ranking Member, Energy & Commerce
2109 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C., 20515-4306

Re: Electronic Prescribing Legislation

Dear Member:

The Coalition for Patient Privacy urges you to include privacy protections in any measures supporting or mandating electronic prescribing. While e-prescribing is attractive to many, we can also state affirmatively that Americans do not want their private prescription information data mined and used without their permission. The Coalition urges you to insure any e-prescribing legislation recognizes Americans’ right to health privacy and prohibits the use of prescription data for purposes other than prescription filling.

Our current system facilitates the daily data mining and sale of every prescription from all 51,000 pharmacies in the United States. This has been the reality for over a decade. You cannot keep a prescription private in the U.S. or stop your data from being sold. Even paying cash will not stop the sale of your prescription information.

Mandating e-prescribing without privacy provisions endorses and encourages the current practices. It sets Americans up for even greater violations of their private health records in the future.

We encourage you to seize this golden opportunity to insure progress and privacy.

How would you feel if your prescription regimen was emblazoned on your shirt for the entire world to see? Did you know that the primary purchasers of prescription records are insurers, drug marketers and employers? What kind of judgments would be made if others knew you took an anti­depressant, a cholesterol-lowering, an anti-anxiety or weight loss medication? What about medicine for a sexually transmitted disease? If you are a diabetic, do you want to be bombarded by unsolicited mail about new diabetic drugs or want your doctor to be pressured to change your medications? Or would you rather discuss that private matter with your trusted doctor?

Clearly, Americans want to keep matters related to their health between themselves and their health care professionals. Americans do not want their private prescription information data mined or made public. All Americans want is to get the prescriptions and treatment they need -­ safely and privately. In late 2007, the state of West Virginia and Express Scripts learned the lesson the hard way. When the 200,000 state employees learned their prescription records were being sold to data miners, they were outraged. Express Scripts promptly agreed to stop this practice when they were faced with losing 200,000 customers.1

The Coalition for Patient Privacy recommends the following basic principles in any e-prescribing legislation:

  • include a right to health information privacy (the right to control access to personal health information);
  • require that any prescription data transmitted via e-prescribing be used only for the express purpose of prescription filling and submitting the necessary codes to the insurer for payment;
  • include a provision requiring prompt notification of privacy breaches;
  • include a provision that creates meaningful penalties and enforcement mechanisms for violations detected by patients, advocates and government regulators;
  • include provisions enhancing the security of e-prescription data such as encryption when data is transmitted, stored or retained in any storage and retrieval systems, including access devices, readable cards or other methods;
  • ensure physicians who decline to use e-prescribing are not penalized;
  • ensure transparency by requiring annual reporting to patients listing everyone who has accessed their prescription data;
  • include a provision ensuring stronger state privacy laws are not pre-empted;
  • require reporting of privacy complaints to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS);
  • require CMS to provide an annual report to Congress on privacy complaints made; and
  • ensure prescription technology allows those with disabilities to be able to use e-prescribing tools efficiently and effectively.

The future impact of greatly expanding the electronic transmission of our private prescription records without privacy will undoubtedly result in a vast array of unintended consequences. Those consequences may include breaches of private information and ultimately discrimination based on illness or genetic risk of disease.

The Coalition for Patient Privacy cannot stress enough the opportunity before you to avoid exacerbating the invasive data mining practices. You have the perfect opportunity to stand tall for privacy, efficiency and quality. Your constituents and the American public will be grateful for your forward thinking. We look forward to working with you and your staff on this issue.

 

Sincerely,

 

The Coalition for Patient Privacy

American Association of People with Disabilities www.aapd.org

American Association of Practicing Psychiatrists

American Association of Small Property Owners www.aaspo.org

American Civil Liberties Union www.aclu.org

American Council for the Blind www.acb.org

American Psychoanalytic Association www.apsa.org

Citizens for Health www.citizens.org

Confederation of Independent Psychoanalytic Societies www.cipsusa.org

Consumer Action www.consumer-action.org

Consumers for Health Care Choices www.chcchoices.org

The Cyber Privacy Project

Electronic Privacy Information Center www.epic.org

Equal Justice Alliance www.EqualJusticeAlliance.org

Fairfax County Privacy Council www.fairfaxcountyprivacycouncil.org

Gun Owners of America www.gunowners.org

Just Health www.justhealthnow.org

Liberty Coalition www.libertycoalition.net

The Multiracial Activist www.multiracial.com

National Association of Social Workers www.socialworkers.org

National Center for Transgender Equality www.nctequality.org

Pain Relief Network www.painreliefnetwork.org

Patient Privacy Rights www.patientprivacyrights.org

Private Citizen, Inc. www.privatecitizen.org

Republican Liberty Caucus www.rlc.org

Tolven, Inc. www.tolven.org

 

cc:           Every Member of the U.S. Senate Every Member of the House of Representatives

 

For additional information please contact:

 

Deborah Peel, MD

Founder & Chair

Patient Privacy Rights

(O) 512-732-0033

(C) 512-970-9007

This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it www.patientprivacyrights.org

 

1 http://wvgazette.com/section/Opinion/200711265

 

“Anyone today who thinks the privacy issue has peaked is greatly mistaken…we are in the early stages of a sweeping change in attitudes that will fuel political battles and put once-routine business practices under the microscope.” Forrester Research

Be first to comment this article | Add as favourites (295) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 4380

Last Updated ( Thursday, 15 May 2008 )
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 41 - 45 of 683
 
     
Free Joomla! Templates provided by funky-visions.de
Template modding by Sven Brier