|
Ending the anachronism of racial labels |
|
|
|
|
Written by Vin Suprynowicz
|
|
Thursday, 31 January 2002 |
Ending the anachronism of racial labelsPredictably, 'civil rights' establishment drags its feet
 by
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
February/March 2002
Martin Luther King, Jr., inspired a nation when he voiced his dream for
a color-blind nation, a nation in which little children would be judged by
the content of their characters, "not the color of their skin."
Today, another black man is attempting to move that agenda forward after
a long national detour. Ward Connerly, the University of California regent
who successfully battled to dismantle race- and gender-based preferences
and set-asides in his state's college admissions programs in 1996, has now
launched a petition drive to bar any state and local
government agencies there from classifying people by race and then
gathering race-based data about them.
The irony is that those who oppose Mr. Connerly's new initiative are not
bullet-headed white racists with white hoods and firehoses, but rather many
in today's "civil rights" establishment -- big-government toadies and
rent-seekers who argue that identifying people by race is necessary for the
special quotas and set-asides which are the only way (they would argue) their particular, favorite minority groups can get ahead
in life.
Though the measure would exempt police agencies who need to describe
suspects by race, hospitals that might need racial and genetic date for
research, and (since no one now dares invoke state supremacy under the 10th
Amendment) federal programs which count people by
skin color, many who would otherwise claim a share of Dr. King's mantle are
obviously worried.
"My worry is that when you stop collecting data it becomes possible to
sweep certain issues under the rug," protests Hugh P. Price, president and
CEO of the National Urban League. "Without data, it would be difficult to
keep track of minority children are doing academically, to keep track of
discrimination in employment," and so forth.
But this exposes an essential fallacy. For such statistics prove
virtually nothing. If a black child is subject to racial prejudice in the
schools that's abominable. But -- lacking systematic new Jim Crow laws,
which are unimaginable -- prejudice by its nature is something best
discerned and demonstrated individually.
If the number of black or Hispanic children doing well in the schools is below average, that doesn't prove willful and systematic race-based discrimination against them, any more than a finding that Jewish or Asian children may be doing better in school demonstrates willful race-based
prejudice on their behalf.
(In fact, efforts to water down the curriculum to "equalize outcomes" are
themselves racist, if they end up lowering the bar on the theory that
"challenged" minority students "can't succeed" if asked to read
Shakespeare. Just ask Marva Collins of Chicago's Westside Prep.)
As black author and economist Thomas Sowell has exhaustively
demonstrated, the fact that retail stores in many inner-city black
neighborhoods tend to be owned by Lebanese or Koreans -- or that merchants
in East Africa tend to be East Indian -- has far more to do with vocation
and cultural tradition than with prejudice: Such "disparities of outcome,"
far from being suspicious, seem to be a rule of nature.
Otherwise, where are the federal racial quota police to investigate the
obvious conspiracy against short white men (not to mention women) when it
comes time to hire NBA forwards and NFL wide receivers?
"We don't ask people what religion they are, what their party affiliation
is or what their sexual orientation is," points out Mr. Connerly. "So why
is it critical to ask about race?"
Interestingly enough, Mr. Connerly's proposal seems to be striking a
chord with the Golden State's multiracial community. They -- like golfer
Tiger Woods, who claims Asian as well as European and African ancestors --
are left scratching their heads by government forms which anachronistically
insist they choose only one grandparent when identifying themselves by
"race."
Visitors from other cultures find this Anglo-Saxon fixation on racial
labeling equally strange. Iranian immigrants report with a mixture of humor
and dismay that -- en route to settling in America -- they have found their
respective government ID cards describing them as "black" while resident in
England, "Asian" while living in Canada, and finally "white" upon crossing
Niagara Falls. When a Singaporean newspaper reporter of mixed English,
Chinese and Filipina heritage earnestly asked what box to check under
"race" when applying for her Arizona press pass in Phoenix, recently, the
sheriff's clerk took one look at her and told her to check "Hispanic" --
the one race with which the reporter was pretty sure she shared no ties
whatever.
Mr. Connerly needs 700,000 valid signatures to put his measure on the
California ballot next November. It's about time.
Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas
Review-Journal. Subscribe to his monthly newsletter by sending $96 to
Privacy Alert, 561 Keystone Ave., Suite 684, Reno, NV 89503 -- or dialing
775-348-8591.
by Vin Suprynowicz
The Abolitionist Examiner - Define 'paraphenalia'
The Multiracial Activist - Who makes 'the best' Americans?
The Multiracial Activist - The hypocrisy of the morally anointed
The Multiracial Activist - For once, bureaucratic nightmare has a happy ending
Copyright © 2001 The Multiracial Activist. All rights reserved.
 Add as favourites (31) |  Quote this article on your site | Views: 2242
Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved |
Be first to comment this article
