{"id":1602,"date":"2008-04-15T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-15T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/multiracial.com\/wp\/index.php\/2008\/04\/15\/national-security-letters-reform-act-h-r-3189\/"},"modified":"2016-12-13T07:51:41","modified_gmt":"2016-12-13T07:51:41","slug":"national-security-letters-reform-act-h-r-3189","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/2008\/04\/15\/national-security-letters-reform-act-h-r-3189\/","title":{"rendered":"National Security Letters Reform Act, H.R. 3189"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>April 15, 2008<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  Hon. John Conyers, Jr., Chairman<br \/> Hon. Lamar S. Smith, Ranking Minority Member<br \/> House Committee on the Judiciary<br \/> 2138 Rayburn House Office Building<br \/> Washington, DC&nbsp; 20515-6216<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  Re:&nbsp; National Security Letters Reform Act, H.R. 3189<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  Dear Chairman Conyers and Ranking Minority Member Smith:<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  The Judiciary Committee will soon consider the bi-partisan National  Security Letters Reform Act (H.R. 3189).&nbsp; We write to express our  support for this legislation.<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  The PATRIOT Act and Intelligence Authorization Act of FY 2004  drastically expanded the FBI&#39;s authority to obtain the business and  personal records of Americans by issuing National Security Letters  (NSLs).&nbsp; NSLs, which do not require prior judicial approval, can be  used to obtain a wide range of documents based upon vague claims that  the information is merely &quot;relevant&quot; to a terrorism investigation.&nbsp;  Once the FBI acquires the records with an NSL, it can keep them  indefinitely, even when it concludes that the subject of those records  is innocent of any crime and is not of intelligence interest.<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  Undeniably, the FBI needs prompt access to some of the types of  information currently acquired with NSLs, but the current method of  self-policing simply does not work.&nbsp; Reports issued by the office  of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice in March 2007 and  March 2008 documented the drastic expansion in the use of NSLs and their  subsequent abuse.&nbsp; The IG&rsquo;s reports also show that NSLs are  increasingly used to obtain records about Americans, making reform all  the more important.&nbsp; The NSL Reform Act appropriately addresses the  problems uncovered by the Inspector General&#39;s reports by establishing  statutory safeguards and judicial oversight while protecting privacy  concerns and bolstering national security interests.<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  The NSL Reform Act includes many beneficial reforms, some of which we  summarize below.&nbsp; First, it would protect Americans&rsquo; privacy  by requiring that NSLs only be used to obtain records that pertain to  suspected terrorists or spies.&nbsp; Thus, it would re-establish the  pre-PATRIOT Act requirement that there be specific and articulable facts  giving reason to believe that the records sought pertain to an agent of  a foreign power.&nbsp; The bill would also establish reasonable limits  on the &ldquo;gag&rdquo; that attaches to an NSL, requiring it to be  narrowly tailored and limiting it to 30-days, extendable by a court. The  bill also provides for a recipient&#39;s right to seek judicial review of an  NSL issued to it.&nbsp; The bill would require the Attorney General to  issue minimization procedures for information obtained with an NSL, and  enhance oversight by requiring additional reporting to  Congress.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>  &nbsp;<br \/>  We believe this bill takes significant steps toward achieving a balance  between privacy and national security concerns.&nbsp; We ask that the  Judiciary Committee consider this legislation and report it favorably as  soon as is practicable.&nbsp; For more information, please contact  Gregory T. Nojeim at the Center for Democracy &amp; Technology,  202\/637-9800 x113.<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  &nbsp;<br \/>  Sincerely,<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee<br \/> American Civil Liberties Union<br \/> American Library Association<br \/> Association of Research Libraries<br \/> Bill of Rights Defense Committee<br \/> Center for American Progress Action Fund<br \/> Center for Democracy &amp; Technology<br \/> Constitution Project<br \/> Concerned Foreign Service Officers<br \/> Defending Dissent Foundation<br \/> DownsizeDC.org, Inc.<br \/> Electronic Frontier Foundation<br \/> Federation of American Scientists<br \/> Friends Committee on National Legislation<br \/> Government Accountability Project<br \/> Japanese American Citizens League<br \/> League of Women Voters of the United States<br \/> Liberty Coalition<br \/> The Multiracial Activist<br \/> National Security Archive<br \/> OMB Watch<br \/> Unitarian Universalist Service Committee<br \/> U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation<br \/> &nbsp;<br \/>  cc:&nbsp; Members of the House Judiciary Committee<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>April 15, 2008 &nbsp; Hon. John Conyers, Jr., Chairman Hon. Lamar S. Smith, Ranking Minority Member House Committee on the Judiciary 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC&nbsp; 20515-6216 &nbsp; Re:&nbsp; National Security Letters&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":4169,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[60,9],"tags":[142],"class_list":["post-1602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-letters-to-government-agencies-signed-by-tma","category-advocacy-and-letters","tag-advocacy-letters"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p89tuq-pQ","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Advocacy-Work.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1602"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1602\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3968,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1602\/revisions\/3968"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4169"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}