{"id":1677,"date":"2012-03-20T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-03-20T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/multiracial.com\/wp\/index.php\/2012\/03\/20\/coalition-letter-to-oppose-efforts-to-force-compliance-with-real-id\/"},"modified":"2016-12-13T07:51:33","modified_gmt":"2016-12-13T07:51:33","slug":"coalition-letter-to-oppose-efforts-to-force-compliance-with-real-id","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/2012\/03\/20\/coalition-letter-to-oppose-efforts-to-force-compliance-with-real-id\/","title":{"rendered":"Coalition Letter to Oppose Efforts to Force Compliance with REAL ID"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>March 20, 2012<\/p>\n<p>RE: Coalition Opposes Any Efforts to Force Compliance with Real ID<\/p>\n<p>Dear Representatives<\/p>\n<p>We  the undersigned organizations write today to express our opposition to  any effort by Congress or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to  force states to comply with the Real ID Act of 2005. Real ID was passed  as a rider to a bill funding military expenditures and tsunami relief.  It gave states three years to comply with restrictive federal licensing  standards, create a national database of drivers&rsquo; license information  and build huge databases of individual birth certificates and other  personal information. All of this would have cost billions &ndash; a cost  borne almost exclusively by the states.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of compliance,  Real ID faced widespread opposition. Groups from across the political  spectrum opposed it. Supporters of fiscal conservatism and federalism  decried it as an unfunded mandate that trampled on the Tenth Amendment.  Civil rights and civil liberties groups worried that the Act lacked  sufficient protections and might increase racial discrimination.  Defenders of religious freedom described its negative impact on the  Amish and other religious denominations. Consumer groups feared it would  result in an expansive and cumbersome new bureaucracy. Advocates  against domestic violence believed it would expose personal information  about survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.<\/p>\n<p>In  addition, many of those same groups rejected Real ID as a national ID.  They believed it would facilitate tracking of data on individuals and  bring government into the very center of every citizen&rsquo;s life. It would  be a de facto government permission slip needed by everyone in order to  travel. As happened with Social Security cards decades ago, use of such  ID cards would then quickly spread and be used for other purposes &ndash; from  work to voting to gun ownership.<\/p>\n<p>States rejected Real ID  because of its high cost &ndash; initially estimated by DHS at $23 billion.  States were concerned that the Act would force them to change their  entire licensing issuance process to conform to a one-size-fits-all  federal mandate. At the same time the states were also making great  strides in improving drivers&rsquo; license security and were rightly  concerned that Real ID would interfere with or overturn many of these  efforts. Twenty five states, either through a statute or legislative  resolution, rejected the Act or said they would not comply with Real  ID.1 Fifteen of those states actually passed laws prohibiting compliance  with Real ID.<\/p>\n<p>As a result of this widespread opposition, Real  ID has stalled. DHS cannot mandate compliance because implementing its  sole penalty under the statute &ndash; barring the use of non-compliant  licenses for boarding airplanes &ndash; would bring air travel to a halt. Nor  has Congress acted to fund the legislation. It has provided only $200  million for Real ID compliance, a fraction of the amount needed to  comply with the law.<\/p>\n<p>Given this reality, any additional Real  ID compliance efforts by DHS or Congress would harm individual liberty  and waste precious taxpayer resources. The undersigned organizations  urge you oppose any efforts to attempt to force compliance with Real ID.<\/p>\n<p>Sincerely,<\/p>\n<p>American Civil Liberties Union<br \/>American Library Association<br \/>Asian Law Caucus, member of Asian American Center for Advancing Justice<br \/>Bob Barr, Former Member of Congress and Chairman of Liberty Guard<br \/>Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights<br \/>Constitutional Alliance<br \/>Consumer Action<br \/>Consumer Federation of America<br \/>Consumer Watchdog<br \/>Center for Democracy &amp; Technology<br \/>Defending Dissent Foundation<br \/>DownsizeDC.org, Inc.<br \/>5-11 Campaign<br \/>Electronic Frontier Foundation<br \/>Electronic Privacy Information Center<br \/>Floridians Against REAL ID<br \/>Hispanic Leadership Fund<br \/>The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights<br \/>Liberty Coalition<br \/>The Multiracial Activist<br \/>Patient Privacy Rights<br \/>Privacy Activism<br \/>Privacy Times<br \/>Robert Ellis Smith, Publisher, PRIVACY JOURNAL<br \/>The Rutherford Institute<br \/>TakeBackWashington.org<br \/>Taxpayers Protection Alliance<br \/>World Privacy Forum<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Footnotes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1  The states are Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii,   Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana,   Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South   Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia and Washington. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>March 20, 2012 RE: Coalition Opposes Any Efforts to Force Compliance with Real ID Dear Representatives We the undersigned organizations write today to express our opposition to any effort by Congress or the Department&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":4169,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[60,9],"tags":[142],"class_list":["post-1677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-letters-to-government-agencies-signed-by-tma","category-advocacy-and-letters","tag-advocacy-letters"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Advocacy-Work.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p89tuq-r3","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1677"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1677\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3927,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1677\/revisions\/3927"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4169"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}