{"id":209,"date":"2001-02-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2001-02-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/multiracial.com\/wp\/index.php\/2001\/02\/01\/wasnt-mended\/"},"modified":"2016-12-13T08:07:20","modified_gmt":"2016-12-13T08:07:20","slug":"wasnt-mended","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/2001\/02\/01\/wasnt-mended\/","title":{"rendered":"Wasn&#8217;t Mended"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><center><H1>Wasn&#8217;t Mended<\/H1><\/center> <\/p>\n<h3><I>by <A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.acri.org\/\">M. Royce Van Tassell<\/A><\/I><br \/> <b>February\/March 2001<\/h3>\n<p> <!--more--> Five years ago, President Clinton asserted that the time had come to reexamine the federal government&#8217;s role in American race relations.  Hoping to leave a legacy of racial reconciliation, The Man from Hope launched a year-long dialogue on race.  Perhaps, the end of his tenure in office is a good time to examine what that legacy will look like.<\/p>\n<p> One place to start is in the Small Business Adminstration (SBA).  The SBA certifies three kinds of businesses as &#8220;Small Disadvantaged Businesses&#8221; (SDB), and therefore eligible for various federal affirmative action preference programs.  As the name implies, every applicant for the SDB program must demonstrate that it is small.  The SBA allows a business to demonstrate either social or economic disadvantage..  To qualify as socially disadvantaged, the owner must either be female, black, Native American, Hispanic or Asian American.  If a business owner does not belong to one of these groups, the owner can still become a SDB, although he must submit a narrative detailing a personal history of discrimination.<\/p>\n<p> According to the SDB application, this narrative must document &#8220;at least one objective feature that has contributed to social disadvantage, such as race, ethnic origin, gender, physical handicap, long-term residence in an environment isolated from the mainstream of American society, or other similar causes not common to individuals who are not socially disadvantaged.&#8221;  Given that the document&#8217;s revision date is March, 1998, three years after the second most memorable phrase of the Clinton era &#8211; it seems safe to assume that this definition of disadvantage represents the Clinton administration&#8217;s vision of &#8220;mend-it, don&#8217;t end it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> While this definition of disadvantage is certainly new, it is also more troubling.  First, it is troubling that the Clinton administration has elevated race to an objective fact.  Such a notion is reminiscent of by-gone years when racist judges relied on now-discarded &#8220;science&#8221; to establish objective racial classifications.  By 1922, though, the Supreme Court acknowledged that science cannot objectively measure race.  If Clinton&#8217;s scientists have discovered the key to identifying a person&#8217;s race, they sure have done a good job of keeping it a secret.<\/p>\n<p> Second, one has to wonder just how far-reaching this definition is.  how does a business know whether it&#8217;s &#8220;isolated from the mainstream of American society.&#8221;  Does that include college enterepreneurs?  Anyone who goes to school full time, and works more than full time creating the next generation of software that we can&#8217;t live without is certainly outside the &#8220;mainstream of American society.&#8221;  What about the militias in Idaho, Montana and Central Utah?  Anyone who buries food and guns against the day when the United Nations&#8217;; blue helmeted minions come to invoke the &#8220;New World Order&#8221; is far outside the mainstream of American society.  Do they qualify as well?<\/p>\n<p> Actually, it&#8217;s pretty clear what &#8220;outside the mainstream of American society&#8221; means.  The Clinton administration is not about to certify college students or militia members as SDB&#8217;s.  They may have changed the rhetoric describing their preference programs, but they are no differet today.  This broader definition casts a wide net so the administration can pander to a wider variety of race advocates.  By couching this wider net in terms that aren&#8217;t exclusively racial, they can claim to have &#8220;mended it,&#8221; without actually changing anything.<\/p>\n<p> What then is the Clinton legacy of race relations?  Let me suggest the following:  &#8220;Wasn&#8217;t mended, wasn&#8217;t ended.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> <b><i>M. Royce Van Tassell is Director of Research for the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.acri.org\">American Civil Rights Institute<\/a>.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h3>Also by M. Royce Van Tassell<\/h3>\n<p><b> <LI><A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.multiracial.com\/abolitionist\/word\/vantassell.html\">The Abolitionist Examiner &#8211; Americans are Tired of Racial Boxes&#8230;<\/A> <LI><A HREF=\"http:\/\/www.multiracial.com\/abolitionist\/word\/vantassell2.html\">The Abolitionist Examiner &#8211; The One Drop Rule&#8230;R.I.P.<\/A> <\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><b><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><small><small><small><font face=\"Tahoma\">Copyright \u00a9 2001 ACRI. All rights reserved.<\/font><\/small><\/small> <\/small> <\/font><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wasn&#8217;t Mended by M. Royce Van Tassell February\/March 2001<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5816,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[7],"tags":[109],"class_list":["post-209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-tae-articles-and-commentary","tag-the-abolitionist-examiner"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2001\/08\/Articles-and-Commentary.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p89tuq-3n","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2709,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209\/revisions\/2709"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5816"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}