{"id":5061,"date":"2000-06-28T09:29:00","date_gmt":"2000-06-28T09:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/multiracial.com\/?p=5061"},"modified":"2021-06-09T23:10:12","modified_gmt":"2021-06-09T23:10:12","slug":"the-values-of-the-slave-market","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/2000\/06\/28\/the-values-of-the-slave-market\/","title":{"rendered":"The values of the &#8220;slave market&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In SOUL BY SOUL: LIFE INSIDE THE ANTEBELLUM SLAVE MARKET by Walter Johnson (an Assistant Professor of Hsitory at New York University), the author describes the stereotypes attributed to slaves for sale:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Dark skinned men: The darkest skin preferred for heavy field work; assumed to be healthier and stronger (more &#8220;masculine&#8221;) than &#8220;light-skinned&#8221; or &#8220;white&#8221; males. The blacker the better as far as field work was concerned.<\/p>\n<p>Dark-skinned women: Assumed to be similar to men in ability to endure hard work; very fertile; not &#8220;delicate&#8221; or &#8220;feminine&#8221; like &#8220;white&#8221; or &#8220;light-skinned&#8221; women (except for the fertility part).<\/p>\n<p>Light-skinned men: Assumed to be intelligent and suited for skilled labor or personal service; not as strong or healthy as dark-skinned men. Fear that they may be too rebellious or literate often made them hard to sell, especially if the males were &#8220;too white&#8221; and therefore deemed more likely to run away.<\/p>\n<p>Light-skinned women: Highly prized for domestic and other &#8220;personal&#8221; (sexual) services. Very expensive, especially when young and attractive. Often described as delicate, fragile, feminine. Some concern when she is &#8220;too white&#8221; (blond and blue-eyed, for example), but not nearly as much of a disadvantage from the slave dealer&#8217;s point of view as &#8220;too white&#8221; males.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Aren&#8217;t these stereotypes still alive? The Seattle Times posted letters in response to the article &#8220;White Girl&#8221; (in which a black-identified mulatto denounced her cousin for identifying as &#8220;white&#8221;; she had been reared as &#8220;white&#8221; by her &#8220;white&#8221; mother with the unmarried mulatto father frequently absent) that were dominated by &#8220;white mulatto&#8221; women boasting that they only wanted to mate with the blackest men they could find. There was also one black woman (who appeared on &#8220;Nightline&#8221;) who boasted that she had bullied her niece (another &#8220;white&#8221; woman&#8217;s daughter) into the same self-hatred. Aren&#8217;t these people still dominated by &#8220;slave market&#8221; values? The most &#8220;masculine&#8221; slave desires the &#8220;most feminine&#8221; slave. However, this time the &#8220;feminine&#8221; slave considers her &#8220;owners&#8221; to be &#8220;black&#8221; rather than &#8220;white.&#8221; How many &#8220;black&#8221; oriented media, TV shows, movies, etc. seek to sexually unite the mulatto female with the black male? Why? Because the &#8220;slave market&#8221; values are still in their minds. I have to also back the previous letter suggesting that black males are responsible for a disproportionate amount of sexual harassment. It&#8217;s true! Perhaps those males see themselves as the super-masculine beasts and studs that their great-grandparents&#8217; slave traders saw. Think also of the current controversy about supposed &#8220;black superiority&#8221; in sports &#8211; the old slave market values back again.<\/p>\n<p>Look at the stereotype for black women slaves and think &#8220;welfare queen.&#8221; Only this time, the babies are not valuable property and the fertility that used to increase her value now lessens it. Consider the black women who are always raving about &#8220;white&#8221; women &#8220;stealing&#8221; their men. Why don&#8217;t THEY seek out non-black mates? They aren&#8217;t &#8220;feminine&#8221; enough &#8211; at least they don&#8217;t have the confidence to believe they are. If black men aren&#8217;t forced to marry them, who will? The old slave market stereotype at work.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Mulatto&#8221; males are, on the average, far more upwardly mobile than &#8220;black&#8221; males in terms of &#8220;class,&#8221; professional jobs, etc. That&#8217;s why 80% of the &#8220;first&#8221; or famous &#8220;blacks&#8221; of the 19th century are not &#8220;black&#8221; at all. They are also more upwardly mobile than &#8220;mulatto&#8221; females in terms of &#8220;caste&#8221; or &#8220;racial&#8221; identity. Just as in the 19th century, they are more likely to &#8220;run away&#8221; and blend into the &#8220;white&#8221; population. In SALLY HEMINGS &#038; THOMAS JEFFERSON: HISTORY, MEMORY, AND CIVIC CULTURE (edited by Jan Ellen Lewis &#038; Peter Onuf), we are told that the black-identfied but very mulatto Hemings family has always been forced to deal, in every generation, with &#8220;runaway brothers&#8221; or male family members who reject the family&#8217;s &#8220;black elite&#8221; pretense for a &#8220;white&#8221; identity. The recent &#8220;Frontline&#8221; propaganda called &#8220;Jefferson&#8217;s Blood&#8221; devoted most of the program to denouncing a Hemings-descended male for &#8220;passing&#8221; and not giving the &#8220;black&#8221; stigma to his children. Sociologist Edward Reuter also noted this in his THE MULATTO IN THE UNITED STATES. I&#8217;m not surprised, since it is easier for a male to move alone in society and find a job to support himself (in both the 19th and 20th centuries). It is also easier, in general, for males to find desirable mates.<\/p>\n<p>Why is it then that movies, novels, plays, television, etc. usually portray the condemned &#8220;passing&#8221; mixed-white as female rather than male? In many schools of racist thought, &#8220;superior races&#8221; are portrayed as masculine, active, penetrating. &#8220;Inferior races&#8221; are supposed to be feminine, passive, waiting to be violated. The female fits the stereotype that many &#8220;black&#8221; and &#8220;white&#8221; people want to present. Remember Susan Kohner (half-Mexican in real life) being beaten up by her Nordic &#8220;boyfriend&#8221; Troy Donahue (in an uncredited role; he SHOULD be ashamed) in the 1950s version of &#8220;Imitation of Life&#8221;? She is meant to represent ALL &#8220;uppity&#8221; mulattoes being beaten down. This wouldn&#8217;t have worked with a male. They can&#8217;t have a &#8220;Nordic&#8221; woman beating HIM up, since sex roles are far older and stronger than &#8220;racial&#8221; roles. Even if he is attacked by another male, his sex demands that he fight back. This is not the passive image of poor &#8220;Sarah Jane&#8221; beaten, helpless and crying in the mud. The ultra feminine image of the &#8220;white mulatta&#8221; is also used as a guilt-free &#8220;miscegenation&#8221; fantasy that is not &#8220;really&#8221; miscegnation since she is sexually available for violation by the black male (supposedly the ultimate horror for a &#8220;white&#8221; female) as well as the &#8220;white&#8221; male. &#8220;Sarah Jane&#8221; is a more sexually charged figure than the &#8220;pure&#8221; Nordic Sandra Dee or Lana Turner precisely because the ultimate violation is unthinkable for their &#8220;Aryan&#8221; highnesses. The audience gets to indulge in &#8220;miscegenation&#8221; fantasies that can be denied by denying &#8220;Sarah Jane&#8217;s&#8221; whiteness.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In SOUL BY SOUL: LIFE INSIDE THE ANTEBELLUM SLAVE MARKET by Walter Johnson (an Assistant Professor of Hsitory at New York University), the author describes the stereotypes attributed to slaves for sale: Dark skinned&#46;&#46;&#46;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7988,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[63,141],"tags":[136,140],"class_list":["post-5061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-a-d-powells-view","category-news-clips","tag-popular-culture-and-literature","tag-slavery-and-reparations"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p89tuq-1jD","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/AD-Powell.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5061"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5061\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7108,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5061\/revisions\/7108"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/multiracial.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}