<\/center><\/p>\n
Attorney General John Ashcroft
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530<\/p>\n
Dear Mr. Ashcroft:<\/p>\n
The undersigned organizations are writing to ask you to leave the current guidelines on domestic spying in place rather than relax them.1<\/A><\/SUP> Relaxing the guidelines to allow the FBI greater freedom to investigate individuals and groups based on their beliefs is unwise, and unsound law enforcement policy.<\/p>\n The Church Committee Hearings in the 1970s revealed an FBI run amok. Americans were shocked to learn the FBI \u201cmonitored political demonstrations, infiltrated civil rights groups, conducted illegal break-ins and warrantless wiretaps of anti-war groups, [and] sent anonymous poison-pen letters intended to break up marriages of political group leaders.\u201d2<\/A><\/SUP><\/p>\n The Guidelines were adopted to prevent the intrusive investigations and techniques used by the FBI to target individuals or groups because of their beliefs. They make it clear that constitutionally protected advocacy of unpopular ideas or political dissent alone cannot serve as the basis for an investigation.<\/p>\n The rules require a valid factual basis for opening an investigation, which largely precludes wholesale FBI fishing expeditions. The threshold for opening a formal investigation is already minimal, requiring \u201creasonable indication.\u201d Preliminary inquiries require even less. The Bureau can begin a preliminary inquiry when it receives any information or allegation \u201cwhose responsible handling requires some further scrutiny.\u201d3<\/A><\/SUP> Nothing, however, prevents a preliminary inquiry from turning into a full investigation upon the Bureau receiving \u201creasonable indication\u201d that a crime has been, or is about to be, committed.<\/p>\n Furthermore, the FBI’s hands are not<\/b> tied waiting for a crime to occur. The Guidelines recognize that \u201c[i]n its efforts to anticipate or prevent crime, the FBI must at times initiate investigations in advance of criminal conduct.\u201d4<\/A><\/SUP><\/p>\n Even advocacy of violence, protected speech under the First Amendment, may form the basis for an investigation when there are indicia that a crime may be committed. While urging respect for the First Amendment, the guidelines state: \u201cWhen, however, statements advocate criminal activity or indicate an apparent intent to engage in crime, particularly crimes of violence, an investigation under these guidelines may be warranted. . .\u201d5<\/A><\/SUP><\/p>\n The Guidelines, therefore, focus the FBI on investigating crimes or gathering foreign intelligence information rather than harassing dissenters. <\/p>\n History has demonstrated that without those guidelines, the FBI targets individuals and groups based on their advocacy and association rather than for legitimate law enforcement. Relaxing the guidelines to allow greater spying on groups based on their First Amendment activity is counter-productive and wastes resources.<\/p>\n Political spying subverts our political freedom. It chills those who disagree with the status quo<\/i>. Our Constitution allows everyone to have a voice, whether or not they agree with the majority.<\/p>\n Increased political spying not only harms our freedoms but has other consequences as well. It diverts resources from fighting real crime. While there may be groups in our country that espouse views with which many disagree, a relatively small number ever engage in criminal activity. Every FBI agent spending his days taking photographs at an anti-abortion rally, gun show, or other political rally is an agent not engaged in preventing and fighting crime.<\/p>\n Political spying is also likely to increase violence. Justice Louis Brandeis recognized long ago that the First Amendment acts as a safety valve. If people marginalized in our society are free to express their views and engage in political activity, they are less likely to resort to violence.<\/p>\n The FBI is already apparently filing reports on those who disagree with the current administration. Relaxing the Guidelines will only result in more intrusive activity. History and current events demonstrate the need for Guidelines that focus the FBI on investigating crime and legitimate intelligence-gathering. We, therefore, urge you not<\/b><\/i> to relax those guidelines.<\/p>\n